Releasing Blount could hurt Steelers in long run
Notice: Undefined variable: article_ad_placement3 in /usr/web/cs-washington.ogdennews.com/wp-content/themes/News_Core_2023_WashCluster/single.php on line 128
Did the Steelers cut of their nose to spite their face?
Everybody seems to agree that LeGarrette Blount deserved to be released Tuesday by the Steelers after leaving the field early Monday night in Nashville, but was that the best move for the team?
It’s quite possible that Blount’s Monday Night stunt was the last straw and head coach Mike Tomlin was just following through on a promise/threat that he made either at the time that Blount was signed or after that little incident with the cops, Le’Veon Bell and marijuana.
If so, it’s perfectly understandable and was the right thing to do, but, if Bell should get hurt and have to miss a game or two, chasing Blount off won’t looks like such a great idea.
Bell has already touched the ball 252 times, including 57 pass receptions. Every running back is always one play away from a season-ending or career-ending injury. Blount was brought here to be Bell’s backup, but he stood on the sideline and watched Bell carry the ball 33 times against the Titans and never touched the ball.
Was that smart?
It was smarter than Blount’s decision to go for an early shower Monday night but not by much.
• Sports fans can be idiots.
This is nothing new but they continue to go where no fan has gone before.
Take Tony Williams, for example.
He intercepted a pass Sunday at the Superdome (or whatever it’s called now) in New Orleans during the Saints’ game with the Cincinnati Bengals. Williams doesn’t play for the Saints or the Bengals. He’s a 70-year old Saints fan who intercepted a pass intended for a Bengals’ fan who was sitting next to him in the end zone seats.
She (that’s right, she) was sitting next to him wearing a Bengals jersey. Bengals tight end Jermaine Gresham scored a touchdown, and when he spotted Christa Barrett’s orange jersey he went to the back of the end zone and flipped the ball to her.
Williams jumped in front of her and snatched the ball away.
When Barrett smiled and asked him for the ball, Williams shook his head no. Then she begged him to give her the ball that was intended for her and Williams still said no.
There has been way too much violence in stadiums these days, much of it precipitated by one moron in his favorite player’s jersey picking a fight with another person wearing the jersey of a player from the opposing team. And that really needs to stop.
But this was one time when it would be hard to blame Jarrett for a violent response.
There were several men seated around Jarrett and Williams and not one of them stood up for Jarrett and demanded that Williams give the ball back.
Apparently, chivalry really is dead.
Of course, the video of the incident went viral and Williams was trashed and ridiculed around the world, but it didn’t seem to phase him. He said he wanted the ball for his grandbaby.
And won’t his grandbaby be proud when 20 years from now, the video of his grandfather shamelessly stealing a ball from a woman is still out there.
This is no small thing.
It’s another example of just how far sports fandom has fallen, but, more than that, it’s a prime example of where the human race is headed.
There was a time when a man would be not only ashamed to do what Williams did, he would be afraid of what other men in the vicinity might do to him if he didn’t give the ball back.
He still has the ball.
And this 70-year old man still thinks he did the right thing. I hope he lives long enough to explain how it was the right thing to do to his grandson.
You would think that any adult working at a major TV network would condemn and/or ridicule Williams for what he did, but 34-year-old Michael Smith, co-host of ESPN’s His-Hers said, “I’m not gonna sit up here and judge Mr. Williams for being a true fan.
“You’re a Saints fan and you got a Bengals fan trying to celebrate a touchdown and getting a souvenir ball at your home field. This is called creating a hostile environment. So, yes I would allow it.”
“She put on that jersey … you take on that responsibility of being a fan, you don’t get no kind of double standard involved here. No. You don’t get the ball. Not next to me.”
This is a grown man, working for the world’s No. 1 sports network as a commentator, and he’s telling fans that they have a right to “protect their house.”
When Smith’s co-host, Jemele Hill, asked him about chivalry, Smith said, “Hey, man, this ain’t a game here. All’s fair. This is war. You’re in the Superdome, you’re a fan. You’re a grown woman, you got a (Bengals) jersey on, you’re the enemy. Simple as that. She’s a fan, She’s the enemy. You are not there to make friends with her. You’re not there to watch her enjoy her stay.”
Once again, this is not a drunken fan in a sports bar. It’s a network commentator saying that a person rooting for the visiting team in a stadium is the “enemy.” He said it with a straight face.
Is this the prevailing attitude among sports fans in 2014?
If so, how pathetic is that?
At least the Saints did the right thing and gave Barrett a game ball.
John Steigerwald writes a Sunday column for the Observer-Reporter.